Skip to main content van Berings

SBTi allows the use of Environmental Attribute Certificates to meet Scope 3 emissions targets

On April 9, 2024, the board of the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) announced its decision to allow the use of environmental attribute certificates (including carbon credits) to meet Scope 3 (value chain) emissions targets. 

Despite the approval of industry groups, which would be facilitated in meeting long-term emissions reduction targets, this announcement raised some objections and oppositions by those who believed that this decision would lead companies to rely on purchasing carbon credits rather than reduce emissions at source, thus resulting in an adverse impact on global emissions reductions.

In a subsequent clarifying statement, the SBTi board specified that any change to SBTi standards, including use of EACs for Scope 3, will be conducted in compliance with the SBTi Standard Operating Procedure, and also anticipated the implementation of ad hoc rules, guardrails and thresholds in order to identify which certificates will be considered valid for Scope 3 emissions abatement purposes. In this way, environmental attribute certificates could function as an additional tool to tackle climate change and accelerate the decarbonization of value chains.

Most recently, on July 30th, 2024, the SBTi board issued four technical outputs, including reports on the effectiveness of Environmental Attribute Certificates in reaching corporate climate change targets, as well as a Scope 3 informative discussion paper, exploring the potential changes in Scope 3 target setting and trying to envision how EACs could be used in science-based target-setting.

In particular, the SBTi has stated that the direct decarbonization of the value chain will remain the top priority, whereas EACs could be used to provide evidence of decarbonization within the value chain, as well as of permanent storage of carbon to counterbalance the impact of residual emissions. Credits could also be used to cover emissions excluded from the current target boundaries, thus outperforming the existing requirements for decarbonization.
Latest Insights

Compliance in Art Transactions: Export Restrictions and Legal Risks

​​The increasingly interconnected global art market is subject to a complex regulatory landscape that governs the import and export of cultural property. The laws surrounding these movements not only address tax and customs aspects but also protect national cultural heritage, setting stringent criteria for the preservation and management of artworks. Understanding international regulations, as well as local specifics, is crucial to avoid issues related to sanctions, seizures, and the loss of value of artworks.

M&A and the Foreign Subsidies Regulation: New Challenges for Cross-Border Transactions

​Regulation (EU) 2022/2560 on Foreign Subsidies (FSR) has reshaped cross-border M&A operations. Effective with notification obligations from October 12, 2023, the FSR introduces additional scrutiny of financial contributions from third countries to preserve a level playing field in the EU market. For companies engaged in cross-border M&A, understanding and managing the FSR is essential for strategic planning.

Art as a Financial Asset: Legal Implications for Companies

The art market has undergone a significant transformation, with artworks increasingly being used as financial assets. Institutional collectors, investment funds, and auction houses consider artworks as strategic portfolio diversification tools and collateral for bank loans. However, integrating art into the financial sector raises several legal implications that extend far beyond mere commercial transactions.

DISCLAIMER: the content of this news is for informational purposes only and neither represents, nor can be construed as a legal opinion